Vision of Ireland | 1961 Census: County Report

1961 Census of England and Wales, County Report (Sample Report Title: Census 1961: England and Wales: County Report: Kent), Table 3 : " Acreage, Population, Private Households and Dwellings for LAA, Wards, CP in RD, Con, NT".

Show top level table	Richmond	Show North Riding AdmC table

Click on the unit name for its home page If appears click for more detailed statistics	Acreage [1]	Population					Private households and dwellings, 1961
		1951	1961				Private households [7]	Population in private households [8]	Structurally separate dwellings occupied [9]	Rooms occupied [10]	Density of occupation
		Persons [2]	Persons [3]	Males [4]	Females [5]	Persons per Acre [6]	Private households [7]	Population in private households [8]	Structurally separate dwellings occupied [9]	Rooms occupied [10]	Persons per room [11]	Percentage of Persons at more than 1.5 per room [12]
Richmond RD Total	78,681	28,795	20,319	12,150	8,169	0	4,673	15,698	4,670	21,690	0	-
Aldbrough CP/Tn	1,807	287	286	138	148	0	103	286	103	474	0	3
Appleton Tn/CP	1,632	101	73	40	33	0	21	73	21	145	0	0
Aske CP/Tn	1,765	111	107	53	54	0	30	107	30	186	0	0
Bolton upon Swale CP/Ch	861	163	46	23	23	0	17	46	17	86	0	17
Brompton on Swale CP/Tn	1,700	542	559	306	253	0	168	505	167	798	0	6
Brough Tn/CP	1,180	139	146	78	68	0	42	127	42	182	0	21
Caldwell Tn/CP	1,590	126	119	68	51	0	38	119	38	167	0	13
Catterick Tn/AP/CP	1,732	2,161	2,011	1,186	825	1	480	1,637	480	2,172	0	6
Colburn CP/Tn	1,361	2,463	2,451	1,249	1,202	1	659	2,381	657	3,425	0	5
Dalton Tn/CP	2,708	147	142	73	69	0	49	142	49	232	0	9
Downholme AP/CP	1,509	77	65	36	29	0	20	65	20	88	0	8
Easby AP/CP/Tn	1,280	126	112	54	58	0	36	112	36	178	0	7
East Layton Tn/CP	1,061	93	75	40	35	0	24	75	24	103	0	21
Ellerton upon Swale Tn/CP	1,620	123	112	49	63	0	35	112	35	165	0	13
Eppleby CP/Tn	1,120	253	232	118	114	0	77	226	77	325	0	10
Forcett With Carkin CP/Tn	2,273	169	152	76	76	0	47	152	47	257	0	8
Gayles CP/Tn	2,574	108	104	54	50	0	34	104	34	178	0	0
Gilling Tn/CP/AP	4,879	669	665	351	314	0	217	660	217	1,053	0	3
Hipswell Ch/CP	2,658	9,048	4,271	2,727	1,544	1	733	2,684	733	3,148	0	19
Hudswell CP/Ch	3,023	292	303	156	147	0	101	303	101	432	0	6
Kirby Hill CP/Tn	250	57	54	26	28	0	19	54	19	98	0	0
Marske CP/AP	6,760	133	124	66	58	0	48	124	48	219	0	0
Melsonby CP/AP	2,742	477	418	223	195	0	133	418	133	609	0	5
Middleton Tyas AP/Tn/CP	3,203	463	477	226	251	0	129	394	129	650	0	6
Moulton Ch/CP/Tn	3,040	239	163	83	80	0	55	163	55	277	0	9
New Forest CP/Tn	3,003	21	23	15	8	0	7	23	7	36	0	0
Newsham CP/Tn	3,411	214	220	110	110	0	72	220	72	376	0	6
North Cowton Tn/CP	1,397	396	376	187	189	0	126	376	126	606	0	3
Ravensworth Tn/CP	1,721	213	185	97	88	0	63	185	63	328	0	4
St Martin ExP/CP	270	157	205	105	100	0	57	201	57	287	0	9
Scorton Tn/CP	2,750	764	871	557	314	0	192	618	192	937	0	4
Scotton Tn/CP	1,490	7,655	4,370	3,180	1,190	2	574	2,204	574	2,176	1	25
Skeeby Tn/CP	835	195	253	118	135	0	86	253	86	392	0	9
Stainton Tn/CP	1,875	19	18	9	9	0	6	18	6	29	0	33
Stanwick St John CP/Tn	1,398	98	78	36	42	0	28	78	28	138	0	0
Tunstall CP/Tn	1,285	265	250	127	123	0	77	250	77	376	0	5
Uckerby CP/Tn	762	51	43	24	19	0	14	43	14	75	0	0
Walburn Tn/CP	1,659	31	19	11	8	0	5	19	5	34	0	0
West Layton Tn/CP	758	47	49	27	22	0	19	49	19	97	0	0
Whashton Tn/CP	1,739	102	92	48	44	0	32	92	32	156	0	7

Click on the triangles for all about a particular number.

Using data from this table, Vision of Britain can map the following rates for within Richmond RD:

Rate	Date
Population Density (Persons per Acre)	1961
Rate of Population Change (% over previous 10 years)	1961

This website does not try to provide an exact replica of the original printed census tables, which often had thousands of rows and far more columns than will fit on our web pages. Instead, we let you drill down from national totals to the most detailed data available. The column headings are those that appeared in the original printed report. The numbers presented here, which are the same ones we use to create statistical maps and graphs, come from the census table and have usually been carefully checked.

The system can only hold statistics for units listed in our administrative gazetteer, so some rows from the original table may be missing. Sometimes big low-level units, like urban parishes, were divided between more than one higher-level units, like Registration sub-Districts. This is why some pages will give a higher figure for a lower-level unit: it covers the whole of the lower-level unit, not just the part within the current higher-level unit.